Market IntelligenceSouth America

Ecuador

Ecuador EV Service Centre Market Entry

Decision-grade EVS assessment of Ecuador for an electric-vehicle service-centre market entry, with official BEV sales evidence, explicit PHEV and charging-count gaps, scenario economics and gated execution.

Snapshot: 10 August 202629-page full report
Talk to the expansion team
BEV floor
9,733

Conservative documented 2025-H1 2026 new-BEV sales floor, not active stock.

Verified counts
0

No current authoritative audited national public-charger total was published; zero denotes verified counts available, not infrastructure.

Jobs/year
3,150

Assumption-led Pichincha+Guayas independent-reach annual service jobs.

Years
3.57

Base simple payback on capped USD 80,000 two-bay partner launch budget.

Executive summary

The verdict in full

  • CONDITIONAL GO only for evidence gathering and a reversible two-bay Quito managed-partner pilot. Official SRI/AEADE data show 5,457 new BEVs in H1 2026 versus 1,512 in H1 2025, up 260.9%; full-year 2025 BEV sales sum to 4,276 from the official monthly series [aeade_jun2026_pdf].
  • HOLD a standalone centre and franchise award. The 9,733-unit 2025-H1 2026 BEV floor is not active stock; PHEV is inseparable from HEV/MHEV in the published hybrid series, and no audited national public-charger count is available.
  • Current executable SOM is zero. Active registrations, customer anchors, premises, insurance, technical data, technician competency and waste gates remain open.
  • Do not open traction batteries. Reviewed rules establish hazardous-waste, lead-acid, tyre and oil controls but not a written damaged lithium traction-pack chain [maate_am026] [maate_bapu] [maate_nfu].

Board decision requested

Authorise up to 45 days of evidence and partner diligence. Do not sign a long lease, grant territory, release the USD 80,000 tooling budget or take vehicle custody until G1-G5 pass. If they pass, release a capped 90-day Quito pilot targeting 180 paid jobs, USD 225+ average repair order, at least 55% gross margin, no HV incident and non-negative EBITDA.

Decision Summary

Overall verdict
Decision
CONDITIONAL GO
Reason
Evidence gathering and a reversible two-bay Quito managed-partner pilot only.
Standalone centre
Decision
HOLD
Reason
No official active BEV/PHEV stock, audited charging count or proven independent demand.
Franchise award
Decision
HOLD
Reason
No audited multi-site demand, quality system or profitable pilot evidence.
Traction-battery opening
Decision
NO-GO
Reason
Reviewed sources do not establish a written local damaged lithium traction-pack route.
Current executable SOM
Decision
0 jobs
Reason
Market, premises, technical-data, people, insurer and waste gates remain open.

Market size and momentum

H1 2026 produced 78,185 new vehicles, including 5,457 BEVs; June alone delivered 1,438 BEVs [aeade_jun2026_pdf]. The bulletin also reports 14,139 hybrids, but that bucket combines non-plug-in and plug-in technologies. The report therefore treats 19,596 all-electrified units as adoption context only and uses BEV alone for service sizing.

Documented BEV sales observations

Q1 2026 is partial and not comparable with full years.

4,276
5,457
612
661
925
894
927
1,438
2025
H1 2026
Jan 2026
Feb 2026
Mar 2026
Apr 2026
May 2026
Jun 2026

Market KPIs

New vehicles
Value
78,185
Unit
vehicles
Period
H1 2026
Evidence
SRI/AEADE [aeade_jun2026_pdf]
BEV sales
Value
5,457
Unit
vehicles
Period
H1 2026
Evidence
SRI/AEADE [aeade_jun2026_pdf]
BEV sales
Value
1,512
Unit
vehicles
Period
H1 2025
Evidence
SRI/AEADE [aeade_jun2026_pdf]
BEV growth
Value
260.9
Unit
%
Period
H1 2026 vs H1 2025
Evidence
SRI/AEADE [aeade_jun2026_pdf]
Hybrid sales
Value
14,139
Unit
HEV/MHEV/PHEV combined
Period
H1 2026
Evidence
PHEV not split [aeade_jun2026_pdf]
All-electrified share
Value
25.1
Unit
% approx.
Period
H1 2026
Evidence
(5,457+14,139)/78,185; not plug-in share
BEV sales
Value
4,276
Unit
vehicles
Period
2025
Evidence
Sum of official monthly series [aeade_jun2026_pdf]
June BEV sales
Value
1,438
Unit
vehicles
Period
June 2026
Evidence
SRI/AEADE [aeade_jun2026_pdf]

BEV adoption history and monthly acceleration

2025
BEV
4,276
PHEV (unavailable)
BEV used in model
4,276
Scope
BEV only; PHEV unavailable
H1 2026
BEV
5,457
PHEV (unavailable)
BEV used in model
5,457
Scope
BEV only; six months
Jan 2026
BEV
612
PHEV (unavailable)
BEV used in model
612
Scope
monthly BEV
Feb 2026
BEV
661
PHEV (unavailable)
BEV used in model
661
Scope
monthly BEV
Mar 2026
BEV
925
PHEV (unavailable)
BEV used in model
925
Scope
monthly BEV
Apr 2026
BEV
894
PHEV (unavailable)
BEV used in model
894
Scope
monthly BEV
May 2026
BEV
927
PHEV (unavailable)
BEV used in model
927
Scope
monthly BEV
Jun 2026
BEV
1,438
PHEV (unavailable)
BEV used in model
1,438
Scope
monthly BEV

Definitions and evidence reconciliation

A central control is the refusal to relabel “hybrid” as PHEV. Secondary AEADE-linked 2023-2024 electric counts conflict, plausibly because of scope or data revisions [eluniverso_2024] [radio_history]. They are disclosed but excluded from the hard denominator. The official 2025 monthly and H1 2026 BEV series is the most internally consistent current anchor.

Definition reconciliation

BEV
Included
Vehicles powered only by electricity
Use
Hard service denominator; official monthly series.
Hybrid
Included
Published series combines HEV, MHEV and PHEV
Use
Context only; never treated as plug-in.
PHEV
Included
Not separately disclosed in reviewed official bulletin
Use
Unknown; excluded from hard market sizing.
Documented sales floor
Included
BEV sales in 2025 plus H1 2026
Use
Conservative planning floor, not active stock.
Active planning pool
Included
Sales floor x 98% survival
Use
EVS assumption; validate against ANT/SRI active registration file.
Public charger count
Included
Official AEADE map exists but no auditable count was published
Use
Count recorded as unavailable, not zero infrastructure.

Five-year scenarios

These are transparent compound-growth planning scenarios from the 9,733 documented BEV floor, not forecasts of registered stock. They exclude PHEV and vehicle retirements beyond the separate 98% survival assumption. Rebase after the active registration file is obtained.

Documented BEV floor scenarios to H1 2031

EVS scenarios from 3,425; not official active-stock forecasts.

Cautious24,219
Base43,643
HighBase case73,910

Five-year BEV planning scenarios

Cautious
Annual Growth Pct
20
Stock 2031
24,219
Interpretation
Five-year planning scenario from 9,733 floor; not forecast
Base
Annual Growth Pct
35
Stock 2031
43,643
Interpretation
Five-year planning scenario; PHEV still excluded
High
Annual Growth Pct
50
Stock 2031
73,910
Interpretation
Stress case; not investment case
Get the full Ecuador analysis
Competitive matrix, location shortlist, incentives, pilot-centre economics and the 90-day entry plan — sent to your inbox.

Charging infrastructure

AEADE publishes a national interactive charging map, while ARCONEL requires commercial charging providers to contract with the electricity distributor and operates a maximum-tariff framework [aeade_charging_map] [arconel_charging]. Neither source exposes a dated, auditable national public-point total. The charging count is therefore unknown, not zero.

Charging evidence availability (not infrastructure count)

Counts and kW are shown only as evidence observations, not a combined network total.

0
1
1
1
Audited national public point count
AEADE national map
Commercial provider contract rule
ARCONEL tariff schedule

Charging evidence and unknowns

Audited national public point count
Value
0
Unit
verified counts available
Period
10 Aug 2026
Status
unknown, not zero infrastructure
AEADE national map
Value
1
Unit
official live map
Period
current page
Status
locations shown; total not published
Commercial provider contract rule
Value
1
Unit
mandatory framework
Period
current
Status
distribution-company contract required
ARCONEL tariff schedule
Value
1
Unit
current annual schedule
Period
2026
Status
maximum-price schedule published

Vehicle parc, age and service demand

INEC counted 3,138,562 registered motor vehicles in 2024, with 45.43% in Guayas and Pichincha [inec_transport] [inec_release]. No reviewed official source isolated active BEV/PHEV stock or BEV age. The plug-in cohort is demonstrably young from sales acceleration, so initial demand should centre on diagnosis, tyres, suspension/alignment, brakes, 12-V, HVAC, charging and used-EV battery reports.

Vehicle parc and service demand

Registered motor vehicles
Value
3,138,562
Unit
vehicles in 2024
Implication
Large conventional aftermarket; BEV/PHEV subset is not disclosed [inec_transport].
Guayas + Pichincha parc concentration
Value
45.43
Unit
%
Implication
Parc concentration supports two-city diligence, but is not EV-specific [inec_release].
Pichincha new-vehicle sales concentration
Value
41
Unit
% H1 2026
Implication
Quito is the first demand-test city [aeade_jun2026_pdf].
Guayas new-vehicle sales concentration
Value
27.8
Unit
% H1 2026
Implication
Guayaquil is the second-city partner pipeline [aeade_jun2026_pdf].
BEV cohort age
Value
mostly recent
Unit
qualitative
Implication
Early demand skews to diagnostics, tyres, alignment, brakes, 12-V, HVAC and charging faults.

TAM / SAM / SOM — facts versus assumptions

The model begins with sourced BEV sales and labels every conversion as EVS assumption. TAM is a serviceable-pool model, not the national automotive aftermarket. SAM uses the 68.8% Pichincha+Guayas share of all H1 2026 new-vehicle sales as a location proxy and a 40% independent-reach assumption. Executable SOM remains zero until gates close.

Annual service-pool funnel

Jobs per year; post-gate pilot target is not current SOM.

11,446
3,150
0
720
TAM
SAM
Executable SOM now
Post-gate pilot target

Sizing assumptions

Documented new-BEV sales floor
Value
9,733
Unit
vehicles
Basis
Official 2025 monthly sum plus H1 2026; sourced.
Active survival
Value
98
Unit
%
Basis
EVS assumption reflecting very recent cohort.
Annual paid service events
Value
1.2
Unit
events/vehicle
Basis
EVS planning assumption.
Average repair order
Value
250
Unit
USD/event
Basis
EVS pilot assumption; validate with 30 quotes and paid jobs.
Pichincha + Guayas location proxy
Value
68.8
Unit
%
Basis
All new vehicles H1 2026; EVS proxy, not an EV-specific fact.
Independent reach
Value
40
Unit
%
Basis
EVS assumption after dealer/warranty capture.

TAM / SAM / SOM

TAM
Vehicles
9,538
Jobs Per Year
11,446
Revenue USD
2,861,502
Status
National BEV floor x survival x service frequency.
SAM
Vehicles
2,625
Jobs Per Year
3,150
Revenue USD
787,485
Status
Pichincha+Guayas proxy x independent reach.
Executable SOM now
Vehicles
0
Jobs Per Year
0
Revenue USD
0
Status
All pre-launch gates open.
1 more row in the full report

Customer and fleet segments

Lead with high-trust, non-invasive diagnostics and wear items. PHEV owners are strategically relevant but not sized. Fleet work should be contracted around uptime and evidence, not discounted retail labour.

Customer segments

Retail BEV owners
Need
Transparent diagnosis, tyres, alignment, brakes, 12-V, HVAC and charging faults
Priority
1
Used BEV buyers and sellers
Need
Pre-purchase inspection and battery state-of-health report
Priority
1
Retail PHEV owners
Need
Potential dual-system service; size only after PHEV file obtained
Priority
2
Out-of-warranty Chinese-brand owners
Need
Multi-brand data coverage and parts pathway
Priority
1
Ride-hail, taxi and delivery operators
Need
Uptime, mobile triage, tyres and scheduled care
Priority
2

Fleet segments

Corporate and utility fleets
Entry Product
Depot audit and per-vehicle maintenance plan
Evidence Gate
10-vehicle anchor LOI
Taxi and ride-hail operators
Entry Product
Battery report, tyres and uptime SLA
Evidence Gate
Five-vehicle paid pilot
Rental and hospitality fleets
Entry Product
Charging support and mobile triage
Evidence Gate
Five-vehicle paid pilot
Last-mile/light commercial
Entry Product
Mobile diagnostics and planned maintenance
Evidence Gate
Route and utilisation study
Public fleets
Entry Product
Tender-compliant readiness and warranty-safe triage
Evidence Gate
Programme eligibility
Get the full Ecuador analysis
Competitive matrix, location shortlist, incentives, pilot-centre economics and the 90-day entry plan — sent to your inbox.

Leading brands and models

The H1 2026 model list is highly concentrated in fast-growing Chinese-origin platforms. BYD Yuan Pro led at 1,202 units, followed by BYD Seagull at 557 and Chevrolet Spark EUV at 540 [aeade_jun2026_pdf]. Tooling and data coverage should follow the top-20 observed model list rather than a generic “all makes” promise.

Leading H1 2026 BEV brands

BEV
Brand
BYD
Units
2,120
Share of H1 2026 BEVs (%)
38.8
Source
Yuan Pro + Seagull + Yuan Plus + Sealion 7 + Dolphin, H1 2026 [aeade_jun2026_pdf]
BEV
Brand
Chevrolet
Units
750
Share of H1 2026 BEVs (%)
13.7
Source
Spark EUV + Captiva EV, H1 2026 [aeade_jun2026_pdf]
BEV
Brand
GAC
Units
338
Share of H1 2026 BEVs (%)
6.2
Source
Aion UT + Aion V, H1 2026 [aeade_jun2026_pdf]
BEV
Brand
Dongfeng
Units
579
Share of H1 2026 BEVs (%)
10.6
Source
Nammi + Mage EV + Vigo, H1 2026 [aeade_jun2026_pdf]
BEV
Brand
JAC
Units
266
Share of H1 2026 BEVs (%)
4.9
Source
E30X + E10X, H1 2026 [aeade_jun2026_pdf]

Priority models

BYD
Model
Yuan Pro
Powertrain
BEV
Signal
1,202 H1 2026 units; leading documented model.
BYD
Model
Seagull
Powertrain
BEV
Signal
557 H1 2026 units; high-volume compact.
Chevrolet
Model
Spark EUV
Powertrain
BEV
Signal
540 H1 2026 units; OEM dealer competition.
GAC
Model
Aion UT
Powertrain
BEV
Signal
221 H1 2026 units.
Chevrolet
Model
Captiva EV
Powertrain
BEV
Signal
210 H1 2026 units.
JAC
Model
E30X
Powertrain
BEV
Signal
204 H1 2026 units.
Dongfeng
Model
Nammi / Mage EV / Vigo
Powertrain
BEV
Signal
579 combined H1 2026 units; data/tool coverage priority.

Competitive landscape

OEM/dealer workshops retain warranty, proprietary data and pack authority. Independent propositions already market EV/hybrid battery-health or service capability in Quito and Guayaquil [coky_motor] [autocentro_supremo] [autonation]. EVS must win on verified competence, insurer acceptance, transparent evidence reports and fleet SLAs.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

Competitor map

Authorised BYD, Chevrolet, GAC, Dongfeng, JAC and Kia networks
Type
OEM/dealer
Footprint
Quito and Guayaquil priority
Threat
Warranty, OEM tools, battery authorisation and parts access
Response
Target non-invasive, out-of-warranty and fleet overflow; never imply authorised status.
Coky Motor
Type
Independent EV/hybrid proposition
Footprint
Cumbayá and Tumbaco, Quito
Threat
Battery-health and diagnostic offer already marketed
Response
Audit capability; differentiate with multi-brand SOPs, insurer acceptance and fleet SLAs.
3 more rows in the full report

Priority cities and regions

Quito/Pichincha is the pilot market because it represented 41.0% of all new-vehicle sales in H1 2026; Guayaquil/Guayas represented 27.8%, Azuay 9.3%, Tungurahua 6.1% and Manabí 4.1% [aeade_jun2026_pdf]. These are demand proxies, not EV-specific regional shares.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

Priority regions

1
Region
Quito / Pichincha
Rationale
41.0% of H1 2026 new-vehicle sales; deepest evidenced demand proxy.
Mode
Pilot after gates
4 more rows in the full report

Consumer and business incentives

Qualifying 100% electric vehicles receive zero-rate VAT and a USD 10 registration treatment; statutory definitions exclude vehicles with combustion-based self-generation, so PHEVs must not be claimed as eligible [aduana_zero_vat] [sri_ev_registration]. No direct national cash subsidy or workshop grant was evidenced.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

Consumer incentives

Zero-rate VAT
Status
Applies to 100% electric vehicles meeting statutory definition
Implication
Supports BEV purchase economics; PHEVs excluded [aduana_zero_vat].
Annual registration
Status
100% electric vehicles pay USD 10
Implication
Recurring ownership benefit; confirm vehicle classification [sri_ev_registration].
2 more rows in the full report

Business incentives

Zero-rate VAT on qualifying BEV imports/transfers
Status
Vehicle-side benefit, not general workshop equipment relief
Action
Do not apply to tools, parts or PHEVs without tax opinion.
Commercial EV-charging activity
Status
Permitted through distributor contract and ARCONEL framework
Action
If charging is sold, contract before commissioning [arconel_charging].
2 more rows in the full report

Tax and investment baseline

Ecuador uses the US dollar. The model assumes normal tax treatment for services, tools, parts and workshop operations and no investment grant. Obtain written local advice on RUC activity codes, VAT credits, income tax, payroll, municipal patent and customs classification before contracting.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

Tax and customs baseline

VAT on qualifying 100% electric vehicles
Rate
0%
Treatment
Vehicle definition is narrow; hybrids excluded [aduana_zero_vat].
Workshop services, parts and tools
Rate
General rules
Treatment
No EV workshop exemption evidenced; obtain RUC activity and tax opinion.
2 more rows in the full report

Company, workshop and labour licensing

A Quito workshop requires entity/RUC readiness, compatible land use and LUAE approval for the exact mechanical, HV and charging activities. Quito classifies mechanical workshops as category II and may require inspections [quito_luae]. Environmental, fire, electrical and insurer acceptance are separate gates.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

Licensing path

Entity and RUC
Evidence
Registered Ecuador entity and active RUC with correct activities
Gate
Before contracts/invoicing
ICUS / land-use compatibility
Evidence
Written compatibility for exact workshop and charging scope
Gate
Before lease [quito_icus]
4 more rows in the full report

Labour and safety obligations

Decree 255 SST management
Owner
Operating entity
Control
Risk assessment, prevention plan, training, incident reporting and responsible-person registration [labour_decree255].
SUT registration
Owner
Employer
Control
Register responsible person and applicable delegate/committee/plan by workforce size [labour_sut].
2 more rows in the full report

High-voltage and workshop safety

Ecuador’s Decree 255 creates mandatory occupational-safety duties, but the reviewed sources did not establish a nationally mandated EV-technician licence [labour_decree255]. EVS should therefore impose its own competency system: de-energise, isolate, lock/tag, verify absence of voltage, maintain calibrated tools, use a rescuer and quarantine compromised vehicles.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

High-voltage controls

Safe state and orange-cable exclusion
Standard
OEM procedure plus EVS SOP
Proof
Observed practical assessment
Lockout/tagout and absence-of-voltage verification
Standard
Engineered de-energisation procedure
Proof
Job record and supervisor sign-off
CAT-rated meter, proving unit and insulated tools
Standard
Tool-control and calibration register
Proof
Pre/post test record
Insulated PPE and rescue
Standard
Risk-specific PPE matrix
Proof
Inspection and replacement log
Quarantine and thermal-event response
Standard
Damaged/wet/overheated vehicle segregation
Proof
Premises, insurer and fire sign-off
Charging installation
Standard
ARCONEL/distributor contract plus engineer design
Proof
Commissioning record

Battery, waste and environmental controls

MAATE requires hazardous-waste generator registration where applicable and controls managers and transporters [maate_am026]. Separate REP routes exist for lead-acid batteries, tyres and oils [maate_bapu] [maate_nfu] [maate_oil]. None proves a damaged lithium traction-pack downstream chain; opened-pack work is excluded.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

Battery and waste routes

Intact traction pack under warranty
Route
OEM referral
Status
Only with chain-of-custody evidence.
Opened/damaged lithium traction pack
Route
No EVS work until written authorised downstream/export route
Status
Hard no-go; BAPU rules do not prove a lithium route.
4 more rows in the full report

Franchise and operating model

Use an EVS-managed two-bay cell inside an audited Quito partner. Hold exclusivity and franchising. The partner provides compliant premises and base labour; EVS controls tools, training, SOPs, data, quality and customer evidence. Guayaquil follows through mobile triage or a second audited partner only after proof.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

Operating model

Format
Recommendation
Two bays inside an audited Quito partner workshop
Why
Reversible and close to the strongest documented demand proxy.
Ownership
Recommendation
EVS-managed capability cell; partner supplies premises and base labour
Why
Preserves SOP, data and brand control.
Commercial
Recommendation
Revenue share with QA obligations; no territory exclusivity
Why
Avoids premature franchise lock-in.
Tools
Recommendation
USD 80,000 capped tooling, training and commissioning budget
Why
Release only after G1-G5.
Expansion
Recommendation
Guayaquil mobile triage/partner pipeline after two profitable quarters
Why
Demand-led network.
Franchise
Recommendation
No franchise award before two audited profitable sites
Why
Execution proof must precede replication.

Pilot economics

All economics are EVS assumptions in nominal USD, exclude financing and tax, and assume USD 80,000 launch capex. Base annual economics require 720 jobs at USD 250, 58% gross margin and USD 82,000 operating cost, producing USD 22,400 EBITDA and 3.57-year simple payback. The 90-day base break-even is 142 jobs; the launch target is 180.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

Annual pilot EBITDA scenarios (USD)

PEN; cautious case is loss-making.

Cautious-37,600
Base22,400
HighBase case90,880

Annual pilot economics (USD)

Cautious
Jobs
360
Arwo USD
200
Revenue USD
72,000
Gross Margin Pct
45
Gross Profit USD
32,400
Opex USD
70,000
Ebitda USD
-37,600
Payback Years
2 more rows in the full report

90-day pilot economics (USD)

Cautious
Jobs 90d
90
Revenue USD
18,000
Gross Profit USD
8,100
Opex USD
17,500
Ebitda USD
-9,400
2 more rows in the full report

Risks and mitigations

The largest commercial risk is not EV adoption; it is converting rapid young-fleet growth into independent paid work before warranty expiry. The largest safety risk remains damaged traction batteries. Both are controlled through evidence gates and a deliberately narrow launch scope.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

Risks and mitigations

Active BEV pool differs from cumulative sales floor
Likelihood
Medium
Impact
High
Mitigation
Obtain ANT/SRI active registration extract by province, model, year and status.
PHEV opportunity materially misstated
Likelihood
High
Impact
Medium
Mitigation
Keep PHEV at zero in sizing until isolated registration data is obtained.
OEM warranty/data lockout
Likelihood
High
Impact
High
Mitigation
Non-invasive scope, customer consent, technical-data matrix and referral agreements.
Battery fire or electric shock
Likelihood
Low
Impact
Critical
Mitigation
Engineered bay, competency, isolation, quarantine, drills and insurance.
Traction-battery downstream route unavailable
Likelihood
High
Impact
Critical
Mitigation
No opened packs; written authorised chain before any change.
Under-utilisation
Likelihood
Medium
Impact
High
Mitigation
Partner bays, anchors, capped capex and 30/60/90-day stop rules.
Independent capability race
Likelihood
Medium
Impact
Medium
Mitigation
Move quickly on audited SOP, insurer and fleet differentiators.
Regulatory/tax change
Likelihood
Medium
Impact
Medium
Mitigation
No grant in base case; quarterly legal and tax review.

90-day entry plan

Days 0-45 close evidence, partner, licensing, technical-data, insurer and waste gaps. Days 46-60 commission the bay and drill emergency procedures. Days 61-90 run the paid pilot with stop authority. The clock pauses whenever a safety or licensing gate is not evidenced.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

90-day entry plan

0-15
Workstream
Evidence
Deliverable
ANT/SRI active BEV and PHEV file by province/model/year; audit AEADE charging map; 30 owner interviews.
7 more rows in the full report

Explicit go / no-go gates

Every threshold is a decision control, not a forecast. Failing G1-G5 prevents launch. Failing G6 stops or redesigns the pilot. G7 and G8 protect EVS from prematurely building a standalone centre or franchising an unproven system.

Full analysis available in the complete report
Detailed findings, comparison matrices and recommendations.

Go / no-go gates

G1 market evidence
Threshold
At least 8,000 active BEVs nationally, at least 5,000 in Pichincha+Guayas, plus separately coded PHEV file
Status
OPEN
Decision
No capex before pass.
7 more rows in the full report

Methodology and limitations

Evidence was reviewed through 10 August 2026. The report prioritises primary and authoritative sources, preserves unavailable values as unknown, reconciles conflicting definitions, and uses a conservative 2025-H1 2026 BEV floor. It is a market-entry decision model, not legal, tax, engineering or investment advice.

Methodology

Define
Method
Separate BEV from PHEV and HEV/MHEV; separate sales flow, cumulative floor and active stock.
Source
Method
Prefer SRI/AEADE, INEC, SRI, SENAE, ARCONEL, MAATE, Labour Ministry and municipal sources.
Reconcile
Method
Retain conflicts and unavailable splits as unknowns; never convert the hybrid series into PHEV.
Size
Method
Use official 2025 and H1 2026 BEV sales only; apply explicit EVS survival, service-frequency, location and reach assumptions.
Stress test
Method
Cautious/base/high growth and operating scenarios; zero grant and zero PHEV in base.
Validate
Method
Recalculate arithmetic, resolve references, inspect key links and translate missing evidence into gates.

Complete linked source register

The package contains a structured source registry with publisher, link, publication date where available, access date and notes. Quantitative claims in the narrative and datasets point to those identifiers. EVS assumptions are separately identified in the model source.

Get the full Ecuador analysis
Competitive matrix, location shortlist, incentives, pilot-centre economics and the 90-day entry plan — sent to your inbox.

Closing position

Ecuador has crossed from “watch” to “prepare”: H1 2026 BEV sales exceeded the entire official monthly 2025 sum. It has not crossed to greenfield-build or franchise readiness. Close the active-stock, PHEV, demand, premises, technical-data, insurance and traction-pack gates, then test Quito reversibly.

Source register

33 primary and derived sources

Show

Get the full Ecuador report

The complete assessment — competitive matrix, location shortlist, incentive and regulatory detail, pilot-centre economics and the 90-day entry plan. Sent straight to your inbox.

We use your details only to send the report and follow up about EVS franchise opportunities.